Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 62
Filter
1.
Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology ; 16(2):763-768, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20241701

ABSTRACT

Background: Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 (IL-6) antagonist, is being evaluated for the management of covid-19 pneumonia. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Tocilizumab in severe covid-19 pneumonia. Method(s): This was a retrospective, observational, single centre study performed in 121 patients diagnosed with severe covid-19 pneumonia. 83 patients received standard of care treatment whereas 38 patients received tocilizumab along with standard of care. Tocilizumab was administered intravenously at 8mg/kg (upto a maximum of 800mg). The second dose of Tocilizumab was given 12 to 24 hours apart. The primary outcome measure was ICU related and hospital related mortality. The secondary outcome measures were change in clinical status of patients measured by WHO (World Health Organisation) 7 category ordinary scale, changes in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, secondary infections and duration of ICU stay. Result(s): Tocilizumab was administered between 3-27 days after the patient reported symptoms ( a median of 10.9 days ) and between the 1st to 3rd day of ICU admission (median of 2.1 days) . In Tocilizumab group, 16(42.1%) of 38 patients died in ICU whereas in standard of care group, 27(32.53%) of 83 patients died. The difference in clinical status assessed using WHO (World Health Organisation) 7 category ordinary scale at 28 days between Tocilizumab group and standard of care group was not statistically significant (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 2.97, p = 0.44). Conclusion(s): Tocilizumab plus standard care was not superior to standard care alone in reducing mortality and improving clinical outcomes at day 28.Copyright © RJPT All right reserved.

2.
Obshchaya Reanimatologiya ; 19(2):4-13, 2023.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20232339

ABSTRACT

Up to 70% of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 need respiratory support, up to 10% need high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive and invasive ventilation. However, standard methods of respiratory support are ineffective in 0.4-0.5% of patients. In case of potentially reversible critical refractory respiratory failure that patients may require ECMO. Management of patients with extremely severe COVID-19 associates with numerous clinical challenges, including critical illness, multiple organ dysfunction, blood coagulation disorders, requiring prolonged ICU stay and care, use of multiple pharmacotherapies including immunosuppressive drugs. Pharmacological suppression of immunity is associated with a significant increase in the risk of secondary bacterial and fungal infections. Currently, data on epidemiology of secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 undergoing ECMO is limited. Aim. To study the prevalence and etiology of secondary infections associated with positive blood cultures in patients with extremely severe COVID-19 requiring ECMO. Materials and methods. A single-center retrospective non-interventional epidemiological study including 125 patients with extremely severe COVID-19 treated with ECMO in April 2020 to December 2021. Results. Out of 700 blood culture tests performed in 125 patients during the study, 250 tests were positive confirming bacteremia/fungemia. Isolated pathogens varied depending on the duration of ECMO: gram-positive bacteria (primarily coagulase-negative staphylococci) dominated from the initiation of ECMO support;increased duration of ECMO associated with an increasing the proportion of pathogens common in ICU (Klebsiella pneumoniae and/or Acinetobacter baumannii with extensively drug resistant and pan-drug resistant phenotypes, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium). When ECMO lasted more than 7-14 days, opportunistic pathogens (Candida species, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Providencia stuartii, non-diphtheria corynebacteria, Burkholderia species and others) prevailed as etiological agents. Conclusion. Longer duration of ECMO resulted in increasing the rates of infectious complications. In patients undergoing ECMO for more than 14 days, the microbiological landscape becomes extremely diverse, which hampers choosing an empirical antimicrobial therapy. Since potential pathogens causing secondary infections in patients during ECMO are difficult to predict, rapid identification of rare opportunistic pathogens and their sensitivity profile, followed by targeted administration of antimicrobials, seems most beneficial.Copyright © 2023, V.A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology. All rights reserved.

3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(5): ofad205, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2326544

ABSTRACT

We performed a secondary analysis of the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT-2) randomized controlled trial and found that baricitinib was associated with a 50% reduction in secondary infections after controlling for baseline and postrandomization patient characteristics. This finding provides a novel mechanism of benefit for baricitinib and supports the safety profile of this immunomodulator for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019.

4.
Lung India ; 40(3): 210-214, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315191

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients infected with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) may have a higher incidence of developing secondary infections. These infections can further deteriorate the hospital course and increase mortality. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to investigate the incidence, associated risk factors, outcomes, and pathogens associated with secondary bacterial infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Methods: All adult COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit requiring mechanical ventilation from October 1, 2020 until December 31, 2021 were screened for inclusion in the study. A total of 86 patients were screened and 65 who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively entered into a customized electronic database. The database was then retrospectively analyzed to investigate secondary bacterial infections. Results: Of the 65 patients included, 41.54% acquired at least one of the studied secondary bacterial infections during the course of their ICU stay. The most common secondary infection (59.26%) seen was hospital-acquired pneumonia followed by acquired bacteremia of unknown origin (25.92%) and catheter-related sepsis (14.81%). Diabetes mellitus (P = <.001), cumulative dose of corticosteroids (P = 0.001), were associated with an increased risk of secondary bacterial infection. The most commonly isolated pathogen in patients with secondary pneumonia was Acinetobacter baumannii. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism associated with a bloodstream infection and catheter-related sepsis. Conclusion: The incidence of secondary bacterial infections was high in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and was associated with a longer duration of admission to the hospital and ICU and a higher mortality. Diabetes mellitus and cumulative dose of corticosteroids were associated with significantly increased risk of secondary bacterial infection.

5.
Kliniceskaa Mikrobiologia i Antimikrobnaa Himioterapia ; 24(3):261-266, 2022.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2291247

ABSTRACT

Objective. To present a case of successful treatment of a secondary bacterial infection caused by non-diphtheritic corynebacterium in a patient with severe COVID-19 and known beta-lactam intolerance. Materials and methods. A clinical case of infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Corynebacterium amycolatum in a 74-year-old patient hospitalized with severe COVID-19 is presented. Comorbidity (secondary immune deficiency due to active malignancy, chemotherapy courses;previous heart disease) and the need for immunosuppressive therapy were triggers for infection caused by a rare Gram-positive bacterium which is usually considered as clinically non-significant. The choice of empiric antimicrobial treatment was limited by the patient's history of beta-lactam intolerance. Results. A multidisciplinary approach to medical care of the patient and alertness to secondary infections helped to diagnose IE in a timely manner and to choose effective antimicrobial therapy. Combination therapy with vancomycin and amikacin helped to make blood flow free from infection. The further switch to oral doxycycline in outpatient settings resulted in the patient recovery from the infection. Conclusions. Under conditions of limited choice of drug therapy, it is critical to have access to modern microbiological diagnostics which make it possible to diagnose rare pathogens. A dialogue between treating physician and clinical pharmacologist helps to choose an empirical and targeted antimicrobial therapy with the best efficacy-safety ratio. There is a need to be alert to secondary infections, including those of atypical locations and courses and caused by rare or opportunistic pathogens.Copyright © 2022, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

6.
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research (Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research) ; 14(2):876-885, 2023.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-2304805

ABSTRACT

Background -. The prevalence incidence and characteristics of secondary infection in patients infected with Covid-19 is not well understood and has been raised as an important knowledge gap. Besides systemic effects of COVID-19 itself, the presence of secondary infections in such patients may have an adverse effect on patient's outcome and duration of stay in ICU. This study was hence planned to fill the knowledge gaps in regards to secondary infection in patients in COVID-19 ICU-their incidence, aetiology and effect on outcome. Material & Methods - The present study was undertaken among Covid-19 patients admitted in ICU of Gandhi Medical College and Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal. Blood and urine samples of patients was taken on the day of admission in ICU and repeated on 3rd day if feasible and was sent for bacterial and fungal culture to determine the presence of secondary infection, causative organism and all patients were followed till discharge/death to determine the effect of secondary infection on outcome. All the data analysis was performed using appropriate statistical software (Epi Info Version-6). Results Out of 100 patients, 50.0% were females and 34.0% of the patients belonged to the age group of 56-70 years. 20 (80%) were males, while the rest 5 were females. Positive growth in blood was seen in 18 (54.5%) of the patients with secondary infection, while urine culture was positive in 11 (32.3%) patients. Both blood and urine culture were positive in 12.1% of the patients. Among the 40 isolates obtained from 33 patients with secondary infection, 8 (20.0%) patients had gram positive infections. Conclusion -. Gram negative infections were common among the patients admitted in ICU. All efforts should be made to improve infection control practices. Strict practice of antimicrobial stewardship will help in reducing drug pressure, which is a key driver of drug resistance. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research (Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research) is the property of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

7.
Coronaviruses ; 2(9) (no pagination), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2265465

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a global pandemic due to its high transmissibility and pathogenicity. It is a beta clade zoonotic coron-avirus like severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Though no effective medication has been developed against the deadly COVID-19 disease, henceforth old antimicrobial drugs have been repurposed to treat the COVID-19 patients. In this report, a brief account of the used medication and the potential mechanism of antimicrobial drugs against SARS-CoV-2 has been provided. Based on the earlier in-cidences, the antimicrobials are expected to lose the battle against SARS-CoV-2. The vast lacuna in the research and development of vaccines has led to overuse of the already formulated antimicro-bial drugs, which in turn has led to a distressing problem called "Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)". A complete assay of AMR has been given including its cause, mechanism, spread, and conse-quences. The other two interlinked problems, namely environmental deterioration and secondary in-fections, are elaborated. Moreover, to combat the AMR problem, the way forward has been discussed in detail.Copyright © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers.

8.
Microbes and Infectious Diseases ; 3(4):796-807, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2262590

ABSTRACT

Background: The primary burden among severely ill COVID-19 cases allocated to ICUs is secondary bacterial and fungal infections. Antimicrobial resistance is aggravated more likely by empiric overusing of antimicrobials. This study aimed to assess the microbiological profile of fungal and bacterial superinfections in laboratory confirmed COVID-19 cases and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. Methods: Various clinical samples were obtained from 117 critically ill COVID-19 patients in the clinical suspicion of secondary infections for assessing the pathogens accountable for the superinfections and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern according to standard microbiological procedures. Results: Among 117 COVID‐19 patients allocated to ICU, 68 (58%) had secondary infections. The most prevalent infection was of the lower respiratory tract. Most infections were bacterial 85.8%. Gram-negative isolates were the most predominant strains, accounting for 71.7%. among them, Klebsiella pneumoniae 43.4 % and Acinetobacter baumannii 20.7% were the most predominant. Majority of the bacterial strains were multidrug-resistant, all gram-negative strains showed one hundred percent resistance rate to cephalosporins, amoxicillin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic. The lowest resistance was observed for tigecycline. All gram-positive strains were susceptible to linezolid and vancomycin. Additionally, all candida isolates were susceptible to the tested antifungals. Conclusions: In hospitalized severely ill COVID-19 patients, secondary infections are most frequently caused by Gram-negative pathogens exhibiting high rate of antibiotic resistance and are associated with poor outcomes. Strict adherence to infection control measures as well as regular microbiological surveillance are required. © 2020 The author (s).

9.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 25(2): e14050, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2271881

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend immunomodulators, tocilizumab or baricitinib, for the management of severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in patients with increasing oxygen requirements. Given their immunosuppressive effects, there is a concern for higher rates of infection among transplant recipients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of transplant patients with severe COVID-19 between April 2020 and January 2022 was performed at the Mayo Clinic. The primary outcome was incidence of secondary infections after COVID-19 diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, ventilatory days, and thromboembolic events. RESULTS: A total of 191 hospitalized transplant patients were studied, including 77 (40.3%) patients who received an immunomodulator. Overall, 89% were solid organ transplant recipients, with kidney as the most common transplanted organ (50.3%). The majority (89.0%) required oxygen supplementation on admission, and 39.8% of these patients required mechanical ventilation during the hospital course. There was no significant difference in the incidence of secondary infections between those who received or did not receive an immunomodulator (p = .984). Likewise, there was no difference in 90-day mortality between patients who received or did not receive an immunomodulator (p = .134). However, higher mortality was observed among patients that developed a secondary infection (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The use of immunomodulators in transplant patients with severe COVID-19 was not significantly associated with an increased risk of secondary infections. Secondary infections were associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality. Future studies of larger cohorts are needed to explore the effect of immunomodulators on survival among transplant patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Testing , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Transplant Recipients
10.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 2022 Nov 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2242354
11.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(1)2022 Dec 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2228004

ABSTRACT

There are several studies showing that the vitamin D status can determine risk of COVID-19 infections, severity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the association between vitamin D (25(OH)D) and secondary infections in the prognosis of COVID-19 patients has not been reported yet. The aim was to investigate whether the vitamin D status affects the rates of secondary infections in patients with severe COVID-19 hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary-level hospital in Turkey. The data of 194 patients with diagnosis of severe COVID-19 who were admitted to the ICU from March 2020 to June 2021 and older than 18 years were evaluated in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups according to total serum 25(OH)D level as normal group (≥20 ng/mL) and low group (<20 ng/mL). The 25(OH)D level was low in 118 (60.8%) and normal in 76 (39.2%) patients. The mean age of the low group was significantly higher than that of the normal group (67.02 ± 14.47 vs. 61.70 ± 14.38; p = 0.013). The systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as the Glasgow coma scale score of the low group were significantly lower than that of the normal group (p = 0.004, 0.002 and 0.001, respectively). The intubation rate and APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score of the low group was significantly higher than that of the normal group (p = 0.001). The platelets number and blood pH decreased, and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, procalcitonin, lactate, urea, creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase concentrations increased significantly in the low group (p < 0.05). The mortality rate was 79.7% in the low group and 22.4% in the normal group (p < 0.001). Microbiological growth was observed in 68.6% of the normal group and 52.6% of the normal group (p = 0.025). The number of cultures with resistant bacteria was significantly higher in the low group (25.9%) than that in the normal group (17.5%) (p = 0.035). The severe COVID-19 patients hospitalized with vitamin D deficiency may have increased risks of poor prognosis and mortality due to secondary infections in the ICU.

12.
Biomolecules ; 13(1)2022 12 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2237631

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to investigate oropharyngeal microbiota alterations during the progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by analyzing these alterations during the infection and clearance processes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by using positive SARS-CoV-2 quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The alterations in abundance, diversity, and potential function of the oropharyngeal microbiome were identified using metatranscriptomic sequencing analyses of oropharyngeal swab specimens from 47 patients with COVID-19 (within a week after diagnosis and within two months after recovery from COVID-19) and 40 healthy individuals. As a result, in the infection process of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the healthy individuals, the relative abundances of Prevotella, Aspergillus, and Epstein-Barr virus were elevated; the alpha diversity was decreased; the beta diversity was disordered; the relative abundance of Gram-negative bacteria was increased; and the relative abundance of Gram-positive bacteria was decreased. After the clearance of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the healthy individuals and patients with COVID-19, the above disordered alterations persisted in the patients who had recovered from COVID-19 and did not return to the normal level observed in the healthy individuals. Additionally, the expressions of several antibiotic resistance genes (especially multi-drug resistance, glycopeptide, and tetracycline) in the patients with COVID-19 were higher than those in the healthy individuals. After SARS-CoV-2 was cleared, the expressions of these genes in the patients who had recovered from COVID-19 were lower than those in the patients with COVID-19, and they were different from those in the healthy individuals. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence that potential secondary infections with oropharyngeal bacteria, fungi, and viruses in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 should not be ignored; this evidence also highlights the clinical significance of the oropharyngeal microbiome in the early prevention of potential secondary infections of COVID-19 and suggests that it is imperative to choose appropriate antibiotics for subsequent bacterial secondary infection in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Microbiota , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Herpesvirus 4, Human , Microbiota/genetics , Bacteria
13.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results ; 13:3547-3551, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2206770

ABSTRACT

Secondary infections are known complication of viral respiratory infections, often leads to deterioration of the patient. Secondary infections are commonly seen in severe respiratory viral infections.Critically ill novel coronavirus diseased 19 (COVID-19) patients need hospitalization which increases their risk of acquiring secondaryinfections. The practice of empiric antibiotics due to limited diagnostic capabilities of many hospitals has the potential to escalate an already worrisome antimicrobial resistance (AMR) situation. This study is undertaken to find out most effective antibiotic for empirical treatment. We aimed to define the impact of secondary microbial infections on the clinical course inCOVID-19 patients. A retrospective study was carried out for a period of one year at RMCH& RC, Kanpur, and U.P. India. The patients admitted in intensive care units (ICUs) and wards of the hospitals were undertaken. In our study a total of 262SARS CoV-2 positive patient's pulmonary culture were assessed. Out of 262 cases,53 (20.2%) were culture positive.Prevalence of bacterial culture positive was 46(86.8%) and fungal positive culture was 7 (13.2%). The most common bacterial isolate was Klebsiella pneumoniae 18 (39.1%)followed by Acinetobacter baumannii 12(26.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.4%), Escherichia coli 6(13.0%), andStaphylococcusaureus2(4.4%).The overall mortality was high among culture positive patients.The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in K. pneumoniaeshowed highest resistanceagainst commonly used cephalosporins. Predominance of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in COVID-19 patients coupled with high rates of resistance to higher generation antimicrobials is an alarming finding. A high rate of mortality in patients with secondary infections warns to improve the infection control practices andantimicrobial stewardship interventions, not only to save patient lives but also prevent drug-resistant, to which the current situation is very conducive. Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.

14.
Kliniceskaa Mikrobiologia i Antimikrobnaa Himioterapia ; 24(3):261-266, 2022.
Article in Russian | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2206324

ABSTRACT

Objective. To present a case of successful treatment of a secondary bacterial infection caused by non-diphtheritic corynebacterium in a patient with severe COVID-19 and known beta-lactam intolerance. Materials and methods. A clinical case of infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Corynebacterium amycolatum in a 74-year-old patient hospitalized with severe COVID-19 is presented. Comorbidity (secondary immune deficiency due to active malignancy, chemotherapy courses;previous heart disease) and the need for immunosuppressive therapy were triggers for infection caused by a rare Gram-positive bacterium which is usually considered as clinically non-significant. The choice of empiric antimicrobial treatment was limited by the patient's history of beta-lactam intolerance. Results. A multidisciplinary approach to medical care of the patient and alertness to secondary infections helped to diagnose IE in a timely manner and to choose effective antimicrobial therapy. Combination therapy with vancomycin and amikacin helped to make blood flow free from infection. The further switch to oral doxycycline in outpatient settings resulted in the patient recovery from the infection. Conclusions. Under conditions of limited choice of drug therapy, it is critical to have access to modern microbiological diagnostics which make it possible to diagnose rare pathogens. A dialogue between treating physician and clinical pharmacologist helps to choose an empirical and targeted antimicrobial therapy with the best efficacy-safety ratio. There is a need to be alert to secondary infections, including those of atypical locations and courses and caused by rare or opportunistic pathogens. © 2022, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

15.
International Medical Journal ; 29(6):329-332, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2156618

ABSTRACT

Bacterial co-infections and secondary infections are common in respiratory viral infections. Since COVID-19 is a respiratory viral infection proportion of the bacterial infections are high which leads to significant mortality. If these organisms were Multidrug resistance (MDR) the situation become worse. In this mini-review, we analyze the bacterial co-infections& secondary infections, and MDR status in COVID-19 individuals Method: This mini-review was reviewed from articles published in PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar indexed journals between January 2021 to January 2022. The keywords used for the search were "secondary bacterial infections in COVID-19 individuals", "MDR resistant bacteria in COVID-19", and "case reports on MDR infections in COVID-19 patients" Results: the proportion of bacterial co-infections and secondary infections are varied from region to region as low as 2.5% to 95% reported. MDR strains are high. Conclusion(s): Unnecessary use of antibiotics, prolonged hospital stay, and overburden on the health care system are the main reasons for increasing MDR strains. Copyright © 2022 Japan University of Health Sciences.

16.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 1041668, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2154750

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high mortality and high antibiotic resistance rates. The aim of this study was to describe BSI etiology, antimicrobial resistance profile and risk factors in a sample of patients deceased with COVID-19 from the Italian National COVID-19 surveillance. Methods: Hospital charts of patients who developed BSI during hospitalization were reviewed to describe the causative microorganisms and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Risk factors were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The study included 73 patients (71.2% male, median age 70): 40 of them (54.8%) received antibiotics and 30 (41.1%) systemic steroids within 48 h after admission; 53 (72.6%) were admitted to intensive care unit. Early steroid use was associated with a significantly shorter interval between admission and BSI occurrence. Among 107 isolated microorganisms, the most frequent were Enterococcus spp., Candida spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Median time from admission to BSI was shorter for Staphylococcus aureus compared to all other bacteria (8 vs. 24 days, p = 0.003), and longer for Enterococcus spp., compared to all other bacteria (26 vs. 18 days, p = 0.009). Susceptibility tests showed a high rate of resistance, with 37.6% of the bacterial isolates resistant to key antibiotics. Resistance was associated with geographical area [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for Central/South Italy compared to North Italy: 6.775, p = 0.002], and with early use of systemic steroids (AOR 6.971, p = 0.018). Conclusions: In patients deceased with COVID-19, a large proportion of BSI are caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Early steroid use may facilitate this occurrence.

17.
Clin Exp Med ; 2022 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2148802

ABSTRACT

Microbial secondary infections can contribute to an increase in the risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients, particularly in case of severe diseases. In this study, we collected and evaluated the clinical, laboratory and microbiological data of COVID-19 critical ill patients requiring intensive care (ICU) to evaluate the significance and the prognostic value of these parameters. One hundred seventy-eight ICU patients with severe COVID-19, hospitalized at the S. Francesco Hospital of Nuoro (Italy) in the period from March 2020 to May 2021, were enrolled in this study. Clinical data and microbiological results were collected. Blood chemistry parameters, relative to three different time points, were analyzed through multivariate and univariate statistical approaches. Seventy-four percent of the ICU COVID-19 patients had a negative outcome, while 26% had a favorable prognosis. A correlation between the laboratory parameters and days of hospitalization of the patients was observed with significant differences between the two groups. Moreover, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida spp, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most frequently isolated microorganisms from all clinical specimens. Secondary infections play an important role in the clinical outcome. The analysis of the blood chemistry tests was found useful in monitoring the progression of COVID-19.

18.
Open Public Health Journal ; 15(1) (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2114795

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by coronavirus is a respiratory infection, that has spread worldwide in the past few months. Considering the necessity and importance of the COVID-19 pandemic, determining the importance of the secondary infection of COVID-19 patients and the death of these patients is one of the main issues considered in the study. Common bacterial infections are often found in viral respiratory infections and are major causes of death. This study investigated the cause of death from COVID-19 within a year. Method(s): In this cross-sectional study from March 2020 and March 2021, 1600 patients with secondary infection were enrolled based on their characteristics, symptoms and signs, laboratory data and presence of other underlying diseases. Chi-square test analysis were used to check the effectiveness of other comorbidities on the mortality outcome among patients with COVID 19. Result(s): Of the 1,600 COVID 19 patients with secondary infection who have died, 900 (56.25%) had underlying diseases, such as 380 (42.22%) with COPD, 80 (8.89%) with cardiovascular disease and hypertension, 25 (2.78%) with Obesity and smoking, 265 (29.44%) with age over 60 years, 150 (16.67%) with diabetes. 700 (43.75%) patients had no underlying disease. Conclusion(s): The most important causes of death in COVID-19 patients were secondary infections caused by important nosocomial bacteria. High mortality rates in COVID-19 patients indicate the importance of secondary infections. Copyright © 2022 Mahmoudi and Bavithra.

19.
Immunobiology ; 227(6): 152288, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2105124

ABSTRACT

The clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), ranges between mild respiratory symptoms and a severe disease that shares many of the features of sepsis. Sepsis is a deregulated response to infection that causes life-threatening organ failure. During sepsis, the intestinal epithelial cells are affected, causing an increase in intestinal permeability and allowing microbial translocation from the intestine to the circulation, which exacerbates the inflammatory response. Here we studied patients with moderate, severe and critical COVID-19 by measuring a panel of molecules representative of the innate and adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2, which also reflect the presence of systemic inflammation and the state of the intestinal barrier. We found that non-surviving COVID-19 patients had higher levels of low-affinity anti-RBD IgA antibodies than surviving patients, which may be a response to increased microbial translocation. We identified sFas and granulysin, in addition to IL-6 and IL-10, as possible early biomarkers with high sensitivity (>73 %) and specificity (>51 %) to discriminate between surviving and non-surviving COVID-19 patients. Finally, we found that the microbial metabolite d-lactate and the tight junction regulator zonulin were increased in the serum of patients with severe COVID-19 and in COVID-19 patients with secondary infections, suggesting that increased intestinal permeability may be a source of secondary infections in these patients. COVID-19 patients with secondary infections had higher disease severity and mortality than patients without these infections, indicating that intestinal permeability markers could provide complementary information to the serum cytokines for the early identification of COVID-19 patients with a high risk of a fatal outcome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Sepsis , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Interleukin-6 , Interleukin-10 , Permeability , Biomarkers , Intestines
20.
Microbiol Spectr ; : e0091922, 2022 Oct 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2088422

ABSTRACT

In the second wave of COVID-19 in India, there was a new challenge in the form of mucormycosis. Coinfection with mucormycosis was perilous as both conditions required a prolonged hospital stay, thus serving as an ideal platform for secondary infections. Using a retrospective observational study, we studied secondary infections and their impact on the outcome in COVID-19 patients with mucormycosis. The outcome in these patients was evaluated and compared with COVID-19 patients with mucormycosis but without any secondary infection. SPSS V-20 was used for data analysis. Fifty-five patients tested positive for mucormycosis (55/140; 39.28). Twelve out of these 55 (21.8%) developed secondary infections during their hospital stay. Bloodstream infection was the most common (42.86%) secondary infection. The Gram-negative (GN) organisms were more common (11/16; 68.75%) compared with the Gram-positives (GP) (5/16; 31.25%). But the most common isolate was Enterococcus faecium (5/16; 31.25%). A high percentage of microorganisms isolated were multidrug-resistant (15/16; 93.75%). Two out of five (40%) isolates of Enterococcus faecium were vancomycin-resistant (VRE). High resistance to carbapenems was noted in the GN isolates (9/11; 81.81%). The comparison of length of stay in both subgroups was statistically significant (P value <0.001). When compared, the length of stay in people with adverse outcomes was also statistically significant (P value <0.001). Procalcitonin (PCT) had a positive predictive value for the development of secondary bacterial infections (P value <0.001). Antimicrobial stewardship and strict infection control practices are the need of the hour. IMPORTANCE Although our knowledge about COVID-19 and secondary infections in patients is increasing daily, little is known about the secondary infections in COVID-19-mucormycosis patients. Thus, we have intended to share our experience regarding this subgroup. The importance of this study is that it brings to light the type of secondary infections seen in COVID-19-mucormycosis patients. These secondary infections were partially responsible for the mortality and morbidity of the unfortunate ones. We, as health care workers, can learn the lesson and disseminate the knowledge so that in similar situations, health care workers, even in other parts of the world, know what to expect.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL